Topic 14 K-Means Clustering

Learning Goals

Clearly describe / implement by hand the k-means algorithm
Describe the rationale for how clustering algorithms work in terms of within-cluster variation
Describe the tradeoff of more vs. less clusters in terms of interpretability
Implement strategies for interpreting / contextualizing the clusters

Slides from today are available here.

Exercises

You can download a template RMarkdown file to start from here.

In this paper, Gorman et al. study characteristics of penguin populations in the Antarctic. We’ll be looking at a dataset of penguin body measurements available in the palmerpenguins package. (Make sure to install this package before beginning.)

Our goal in using this data is to better understand the following questions: What similarities are there among the penguins? Do there appear to be different species? If so, how many species are there?

library(dplyr)
library(ggplot2)
library(palmerpenguins)
data(penguins)

# Remove observations with missing data on key variables
penguins <- penguins %>%
    filter(!is.na(bill_length_mm), !is.na(bill_depth_mm), !is.na(flipper_length_mm))

Exercise 1: Visual explorations

We’ll first explore clustering based on characteristics of the penguins’ bills/beaks. There are two variables that measure the length and depth of the penguins’ bills (in mm): bill_length_mm and bill_depth_mm.

Make a scatterplot of these two measurements. If you had to visually designate 3 different penguin clusters (possible species), how would you designate them?

ggplot(penguins, aes(???)) +
    geom_point()

Based on the plot, are there any differences in scale that you might be concerned about?

Exercise 2: K-means clustering on bill length and depth

The kmeans() function in R performs k-means clustering.

Use the code below to run k-means for $k = 3$ clusters. Why is it important to use set.seed()? (In practice, it’s best to run the algorithm for many values of the seed and compare results.)

# Select just the bill length and depth variables
penguins_sub <- penguins %>%
    select(bill_length_mm, bill_depth_mm)

# Run k-means for k = centers = 3
set.seed(253)
kclust_3 <- kmeans(penguins_sub, centers = 3)

# Display the cluter assignments
kclust_3$cluster

# Add a variable (kclust_3) to the original dataset 
# containing the cluster assignments
penguins <- penguins %>%
    mutate(
        kclust_3 = factor(kclust_3$cluster)
    )

Update your original scatterplot to add a color aesthetic that corresponds to the kclust_3 variable created above. Do the cluster assignments correspond to your intuition from exercise 1? Why might this be?

# Visualize the cluster assignments on the original scatterplot

Exercise 3: Addressing variable scale

We can use the code below to rerun k-means clustering on the scaled data. The scaled data have been rescaled so that the standard deviation of each variable is 1. Remake the scatterplot to visualize the updated cluster assignments. Do the cluster assignments correspond to your intuition from exercise 1?

# Run k-means on the *scaled* data (all variables have SD = 1)
set.seed(253)
kclust_3_scale <- kmeans(scale(penguins_sub), centers = 3)
penguins <- penguins %>%
    mutate(
        kclust_3_scale = factor(kclust_3_scale$cluster)
    )

# Visualize the new cluster assignments

Exercise 4: Clustering on more variables

We can use as many variables in our clustering as makes sense given our goals. The dataset contains another body measurement variable of interest to us: flipper_length_mm (flipper length in mm).

Complete the code below to cluster on bill length and depth as well as flipper length. Looking at the summary statistics, do you think it would be best to scale the variables?

# Select the variables to be used in clustering
penguins_sub <- penguins %>%
    select(???)

# Look at summary statistics of the 3 variables
summary(penguins_sub)

# Perform clustering: should you use scale()?
set.seed(253)
kclust_3_3vars <- kmeans(???)

penguins <- penguins %>%
    mutate(
        kclust_3_3vars = factor(kclust_3_3vars$cluster)
    )

Exercise 5: Interpreting the clusters

One way to interpet the resulting clusters is to explore how variables differ across the clusters. We can look at the 3 variables used in the clustering as well as a body mass variable available in the dataset.

Run the code below to look at the mean bill length, bill depth, flipper length, and body mass across the 3 clusters. What characterizes each of the 3 clusters? Try to come up with contextual “names” for the clusters (e.g., “big beaks” or “small penguins”).

penguins %>%
    group_by(kclust_3_3vars) %>%
    summarize(across(c(bill_length_mm, bill_depth_mm, flipper_length_mm, body_mass_g), mean))

Exercise 6: Picking $k$

We’ve been using $k = 3$ so far, but how can we pick $k$ using a data-driven approach. One strategy is to compare the total squared distance of each case from its assigned centroid for different values of $k$. (This measure is available within the $tot.withinss component of objects resulting from kmeans().)

Run the code below to create this plot for choices of $k$ from 1 to 15. Using this plot and thinking about data context and our scientific goals, what are some reasonable choices for the number of clusters?

# Create storage vector for total within-cluster sum of squares
tot_wc_ss <- rep(0, 15)

# Loop
for (k in 1:15) {
    # Perform clustering
    kclust <- kmeans(scale(penguins_sub), centers = k)

    # Store the total within-cluster sum of squares
    tot_wc_ss[k] <- kclust$tot.withinss
}

plot(1:15, tot_wc_ss, xlab = "Number of clusters", ylab = "Total within-cluster sum of squares")

STAT 253: Statistical Machine Learning